@LaunchTheDamnThing,
I’m very grateful to you for taking the time to offer your advice, personal experience, and encouragement – thank you! (And I realized, after seeing your username, that I have been on your site before and it’s beautiful!)
You make a great point with regard to different clients being comfortable with different levels of involvement with their site and how that should factor into SK usage. I would say that, thus far, my clients tend to fall along a 50/50 split as far as how “busy” they like to be with their sites. (Is it bad that I sometimes wish most of them did NOT want to play with their new toy after I finish making it?) I try to elicit this information from them during the pre-build phase, so I know what I’m dealing with. For those who express a desire to regularly “fuss” with their site, I do take a slightly different approach to what and how I code for them. It would seem that SK could be considered and treated similarly.
Thank you for explaining how you use the “Active” sites feature of your SK account, too! I was eyeing the “Designer” tier of the subscription options but for now have the one-site Pro tier, (experimenting on my own before playing with others’ sites.) I was a bit fuzzy on precisely how moving sites in and out of “Active” mode worked, but that sounds awesome!
Ah, and imposter syndrome is real! I think, still being relatively new to web design (just a few years in, as it were), I just want to ensure I’m really doing right by my clients. I’m a bit neurotic about details and what-ifs and have a tendency to privately make myself a little nuts worrying about anything and everything. I would hate for them to go elsewhere down the road for whatever reason and feel, after speaking with another designer, that I had shortchanged them by not coding everything manually…or something to that effect, if that makes sense.
I did have a bit of a laugh when you described the SQSP site that looked like it had stepped out of 1999 -- not out of meanness, mind you -- but because I too have seen more than one of those and was similarly stunned when I realized they were SQSP sites! (I confess that sometimes those inadvertent discoveries DO make me feel a bit better about my skillset...but then I feel bad for that making me feel better. Well, I mean…we’re being polite and not naming names, so there’s that!) 😉 (And everyone must start somewhere, I know.)
I sincerely appreciate your closing comments regarding what constitutes a “real” web designer. I am a designer, for sure not a developer. I can write a fair amount of HTML, CSS, and juuust enough JS to be dangerous, but I defer to those far more experienced than me on that end of things, generally.
Excellent point regarding SK being analogous to things like Dubsado, etc. Time is money, as you said, and I can see SK saving me plenty of the former and potentially earning me a bit more of the latter. Also: another great point concerning backend code alterations! I do very much dig that aspect of SK being on top of any SQSP changes for us. SQSP alone saves SO much agony and labor compared to WordPress, for example, and SK just kind of adds another layer of comfort with the code being stored separately from the main SQSP CSS we implement ourselves.
You have given me much food for thought and offered a very helpful array of info and insights, and I thank you again! Your time and knowledge are much appreciated!
Heather